TikTok Doesnât Want Us To Talk About the News
The Rise of the AI Censors
Last week, Oxford Universityâs Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism released its annual digital news report, which found that âfor the first time, social media and video networks are, on average across the markets covered, more popular than both TV and owned news websites and apps as sources of news.â The analysis looked at news consumption patterns around the world. It found over three quarters of the population is watching online news videos each week and many people rely on it more than traditional television broadcasts.
Itâs clear that online video, especially short-form clips, is crucial for reaching the public. Thatâs particularly true since traditional internet traffic is rapidly drying up for most media outlets. The sharp audience dropoff is largely attributable to an AI takeover at the worldâs largest search engine.
In this landscape, video matters more than ever, particularly TikTok. The Reuters Institute report noted that TikTok and Instagram are âthe fastest growing video-led networksâ with the latter platform leading the way.
Given all of these trends, I have started trying to build up my own TikTok presence with an eye towards ultimately creating more official TPM content on the platform. I quickly found out that the influential app makes it almost impossible for small and independent creators to report or comment on current events. Based on my own experience, it seems far-right politics thrives on the platform while reporting on extremism is almost instantly shut down.
I began regularly trying to post videos about news, history, and culture last month. Some were quickly removed.
The first clip taken down was one where I talked about Italian dictator Benito Mussoliniâs great grandson playing pro soccer â and electrifying Europeâs far right fans. There was no explanation for the removal and when I tried to appeal, it was denied. The response to the appeal indicated TikTokâs censors determined the video promoted âViolent and Hateful Organizations and Individuals.â Of course, while I had indeed mentioned extremist groups in the clip, it wasnât at all positive or promotional. The video also was posted to YouTube without issue.
Based on the near-instant speed of the removal, it seemed clear AI was in control of the heavy handed censorship on the platform. I was disturbed by the experience, especially since I have heard other creators have faced similar issues since earlier this year when, after intervention from the White House, TikTok was taken over by a new American ownership group that includes the Oracle Corporation led by Larry Ellison, a billionaire backer of President Donald Trump.
After my video on Mussolini was taken down, I put several of these questions to TikTokâs public relations department in an email. I sent them the copy of my video on YouTube along with links to several clips that had been permitted to air on TikTok including a trending pro-Mussolini dance featuring fascist salutes and videos focused on âBlack fatigueâ and âJew fatigue,â two extremist memes that are as blatantly antisemitic and racist as their names suggest.
TikTok never responded to my query. However, shortly after I sent it, my video was reinstated and the various extremist clips I flagged were all taken down.
Of course, that kind of special treatment is not what weâre looking for and itâs not an answer to the larger questions here. As of this writing, there are tons of âBlack fatigue,â antisemitic, and pro-fascist clips live on the platform. In fact, while individual videos I flagged were removed, an account I pointed to that is wholly focused on âblk&jewfatigueâ is still publishing on TikTok.
And, even after apparent intervention from TikTok PR, another clip of mine was nearly instantly removed for an unspecified âcommunity guidelinesâ violation. The video talked about how the UFC heavyweight who insulted Michelle Obama at the White House fights earlier this month became a jiu jitsu meme. Once again, I was able to share it on YouTube without incident. Weâve also had no problem posting content on Instagram.
I ended up filming a TikTok detailing this experience and sending it to the platformâs PR department with a new round of questions. As of this writing, they have not offered any response.
That wasnât even the last of it. Another clip I made showing the questionable salute gesture one of the UFC fighters made at the White House was also taken down a few days after I posted it earlier that month. That one was removed after a copyright claim from Paramount, which has a streaming deal with UFC and is another part of Ellisonâs media empire. The clip featured a few seconds of clearly newsworthy footage from the fight, which was filmed on government property. Other videos â that did not highlight the controversial nature of the gesture â were apparently unchallenged by Paramount. And, once again, this exact video of mine has no issues on YouTube. I appealed the decision noting that my usage of the footage clearly fit under the fair use exemption for news reporting. So far, my appeal has received no response.
I am far from the only content creator who has run into these issues. Ryan Broderick, who is editor-in-chief of the excellent Garbage Day newsletter, which chronicles internet culture, has written about his own experience repeatedly being âthrown in TikTok jailâ since the platformâs new ownership took over.
In a conversation earlier this month, Broderick talked to me about his experience with TikTok, or, as he put it, his âleast favorite relationship on the internet.â Broderick said that Garbage Day had multiple videos taken down with no explanation and that he knew other creators who were simply giving up on the platform. Like TPM, he also has not received on the record responses from TikTok to questions about its censorship policies. However, through his reporting and analysis, Broderick has been able to get some sense of the dynamics on the platform.
Broderick said that, based on his conversations, he believes accounts with six-figure followings have largely been able to dodge the aggressive AI censorship.
âMy read on this is, like, if you can fight through the kind of brutal establishment of your account and you can get a big audience, TikTok will just sort of give you carte blanche,â Broderick explained.
According to Broderick, much of the censorship is taking place in what he called a âweird middle groundâ of accounts with mid-size followings and regular posting schedules. And, of course, that space is exactly where small, independent media outlets like TPM and Garbage Day reside.
Broderick also believes that some of these changes to the platform have coincided with the takeover by the new American ownership group.
âWe have a separate team that basically scours every platform for metrics every month. We call it âGarbage Intelligence.â Itâs a thing we do for our paid readers,â said Broderick. âWe track month to month changes on TikTok through that. And we have noticed changes. So, I can say to you without a shadow of a doubt that the algorithm is different.â
Prior to Trump pushing TikTok to new owners, the platform was known for an algorithm that curated highly individualized feeds for viewers. But Broderick said Garbage Day has found that, following the takeover, for the first time in about three years, the same accounts consistently had the most engagement each month. And those pages were not focused on current events.
âTikTok has never wanted to be a news platform. Like itâs extremely allergic to when news happens on the platform. It always has been,â he explained.
TikTok may not ever have been designed as a news service. And Broderick doesnât believe the worst theories that have emerged about Ellison solely censoring left-wing content on the platform are correct. However, he does suspect that the company has become a less hospitable environment for media outlets overall.
âThe major line youâre seeing from a lot of people right now is Oracle is run by a right-wing oligarch with ties to Trump and theyâre going to censor creators. The fact is, thatâs really hard to do. Like, itâs very hard to censor a left-wing creator without also censoring right-wing creators because the stuff that theyâre talking about is largely the same,â Broderick said, before adding: âBut what they can do is they can make it harder, you know, for certain kinds of accounts to get started.â
Broderick also believes that, under its new ownership, TikTok is burying news â and particularly left perspectives â under âslop.â
âWe saw this when Facebook got rid of the news feed â like for news content, they can emphasize dumber stuff, which is definitely whatâs happening on TikTok,â said Broderick. âInstead of censoring the left, they can bury it in stupid shit. And thatâs, I think, absolutely happening on TikTok.â
Welcome to the new internet. Your search results and feeds are being controlled in ways you may not have realized. AI, billionaires, and total blackouts are now part of the game.
It Begins Where It Ends
Donald Trumpâs son, Barron, and granddaughter, Kai, are going into the family business. The young entrepreneurs have each recently launched a beverage brand â and judging from a review of the beverages in The Guardian, theyâre targeting a new generation of suckers to swallow their nonsense.
Baronâs beverage brand is called Sollos. This is what The Guardianâs Adam Gabbat had to say about it:
Sold with the vaguely threatening slogan âIt begins where it endsâ, Sollos says it is a âbrand built around the Florida lifestyleâ. Which lifestyle? Retirement home? Monster truck? It doesnât say.
The drinkâs âaboutâ page does, however, claim that âSOLLOS is designed revolving around the cycle of the sunâ, a phrase as grammatically incorrect as it is meaningless, while its creators â Trump, 20, is one of five co-founders, all of whom have spent some time in Florida â also say the drink âis built to move with your dayâ, a phrase I do not understand.
âMost brands launch with four flavors hoping youâll like one of them; we have been obsessing over one flavor until it was flawless,â the website claims. The flavor they went with is pineapple and coconut, and it retails at an eye-watering $39.99 for 12 cans. It arrived, to its credit, in very nice packaging.
Excited, I opened a can of Sollos. It smelled like suncream mixed with pineapple juice. I took a sip. It tasted like suncream mixed with pineapple juice. I poured some out. Itâs the color of a sort of posh apple juice, with the glass-staining sugariness to match.
Itâs not for me. But then, I am not the target audience: I am neither seeking a beverage that will, in Sollosâs words, âtruly fit how people in Florida actually liveâ, nor I am necessarily looking for something which âall started in a cabanaâ.
Kai Trumpâs drink is Blue Raz Slush which was âinspired by nostalgic blue raspberry slushies and summertime memoriesâ. Gabbatâs review:
Bad. It is a bad drink. Like Red Bull but with a more chemical finish, it did not taste of summertime memories â none of my memories, anyway â although I suppose one could say that it does have a bold flavor.
Both brands are likely to morph into meme coins soon so get them while supplies last!
Rehabilitating Watergate
The âhonorableâ JD Vance spoke at an event at the Nixon Library on Thursday and had this to say about the only president forced to resign the office:
I think Nixonâs historical legacy is enjoying a bit of a renaissance, and deservedly so. I joked that if Watergate happened tomorrow, it would be like a 12-hour news story. The idea that it took down a presidency is crazy. And by the way, if you look at the story of how the deep state took down Richard Nixon, its not all that different from what the same groups of people, the same institutions tried to do to Donald Trump in the first Trump Administration. There is a parallel.
How Much of This Weekâs News Do You Remember?
1. Whatâs the too-good-to-be-true name of the Trump-donor owned company that won a no-bid contract to clean the Reflecting Pool (and seems to have completely fumbled the job)?
2. Which former Federal Reserve chair died this week?
3. Whatâs the title of JD Vanceâs new book on his conversion to Catholicism, which has been widely panned by critics?
We Won All The Damn Elections
âI think itâs ironic that we control the House, Senate, Supreme Court, and the White House, and weâre yelling âelection fraudâ? I mean, we won all the damn elections.â âThomas Massie
Youâre an Idiot!
Trivia answers: 1) Greenwater Services 2) Alan Greenspan 3) Communion: Finding My Way Back to Faith
Correction: The answer to last weekâs question âWhich two behemoth media companies did the DOJ decide to allow to merge this week despite antitrust concerns?â should have been Paramount Skydance and Warner Bros. Discovery. We regret the mistake.
Happy Caturday!
Heather & Paul;
@ Hunter Walker
That was some great reporting on Tik Tok. That, and spaces like it, are exactly where the war is being fought for everyone under 40-45.
The formats already have every incentive to be light on anything edifying and heavy on everything that is trivial. Popular âgarbageâ or âjunk drawerâ type of content is always likely to smother real news and important, existential content even without a heavy finger on the scales.
Now, add in a 100 incentives for these companies to monetize and sanitize and groom their content and it becomes a sewer. Now, add in another 100 incentives for them to take political sides, engender cronyism and crony synergy, and political/oligarchical motives and it is worse than a sewer.
NowâŚthis would be horrible no matter what the product is (shows, movies, art, entertainment)âŚbut the reality is that it is COMMS. Absolutely essential to forming opinion, guiding discussion, hiding what they donât want you to see, obscuring truth, flooding the zone, and fighting real news that could be emerging on other platforms.
Welcome, but be good? Is there anything that doesnât do thatâs not colossally stupid
For the AI skeptics here, a new interview below with Ed Zitron, a hardcore doomerist on the financial side of AI. I donât know if Zitronâs predictions will pan out, but heâs always fun to listen to on this subject.
Click the YouTube link if it cuts out here.
How it works
Once you click Generate, Ollama reads this article and crafts 5 comprehension questions. Your answers are graded against the article content â general knowledge won't be enough. Score 70+ to count toward your certificate.
Questions are cached â you'll always get the same 5 for this article.