Democrats flirt with becoming the anti

Democrats flirt with becoming the anti-tariff party amid Trump's trade war 'It really is an extraordinary moment when you have progressive Democrats quoting Milton Friedman,' said Andrew Hale, a fellow at Advancing American Freedom WASHINGTON, D.C. — Since the 1970s, U.S. Democrats have been more closely associated with labour protection, while Republicans have been aligned with free trade. Under President Donald Trump, however, the GOP has been embracing its pro-tariff era. In recent weeks, the opposition has been showing increasing signs of moving toward freer trade. Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer recently introduced the End Trump’s Tariff Tax Act to revoke and refund Trump’s latest global and Canadian tariffs. The bill covers the balance-of-payments tariffs, the roughly 10 per cent duties imposed after courts rejected the administration’s use of IEEPA to impose broad tariffs; the specified Section 301 tariffs targeting goods from 60 countries over alleged forced-labour practices; and the Section 338 tariffs imposed under the administration’s claim that Canada discriminated against U.S. exporters. Schumer’s bill is already attracting broad Democratic support, including Senate Finance Committee chairman Ron Wyden (Oregon), business-friendly Virginia Democrats Tim Kaine and Mark Warner, and Sen. Elissa Slotkin, whose swing state of Michigan is on the frontline of the Canadian tariff and affordability fights heading into the midterm elections. Five Democratic senators, including Slotkin, Amy Klobuchar (Minnesota), Chris Coons (Delaware), Patty Murray (Washington), and Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire), recently warned that the Canada duties would raise costs for families, businesses and farmers. “(Trump’s) tariffs will squeeze our states’ small businesses and farmers harder and drive costs up for working families,” they wrote. “They will raise the cost of the lumber, plywood, and construction equipment we need to build new housing. They will hurt our workers and businesses who manufacture autos, aircraft, and machinery. They will drive up the prices consumers pay for everyday basics like milk, clothing, and paper products.” Democrats are increasingly framing Trump’s tariffs as a tax on families amid the affordability crisis. But does that amount to a historic shift for America’s labour party — or simply an effective way to attack an unpopular president ahead of November’s midterms? “It really is an extraordinary moment when you have progressive Democrats quoting Milton Friedman … and having to defend free markets and free trade,” said Andrew Hale, a fellow at Advancing American Freedom, referring to a March lawsuit filed by 24 states, led by Democratic attorneys general, challenging Trump’s 10 per cent global tariffs imposed under Section 122. The filing cited Friedman’s criticism of protectionism. “I feel I have woken up in the Democrat Party of Jimmy Carter and Walter Mondale. If you look at the Democrat Party platforms of 1980, ’84, ’88, they’re identical to the policies of J.D. Vance,” he added. That comparison may be overstated, but the political realignment he describes is visible in the Democrats’ current messaging. Ahead of November’s vote, the party is increasingly tying Trump’s tariffs to higher prices and the broader affordability crisis. “There does seem to be a link to affordability and tariffs that is becoming a dominant thread in voter perception right now,” said Inu Manak, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE). Alfredo Carrillo Obregon, a trade policy analyst at the Cato Institute, agrees. “It’s become a very timely political opportunity to push back against the tariffs,” he said, adding that “voters, in their minds, have made the link between tariffs and higher prices.” But Democrats are also trying to distinguish between good and bad tariffs, a line that could be hard to articulate. “As the Biden interlude showed, many Democrats remain warmly disposed towards tariffs,” said Gary Hufbauer, senior fellow at the PIIE, referring to Biden’s decision to retain Trump’s first-term tariffs on Chinese goods and most of his Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum. “Now in opposition, Democrats need to fashion a policy line that distinguishes ‘good tariffs’ from ‘bad tariffs’. On the ‘bad’ side of the line are tariffs that plainly raise consumer prices but don’t protect many firms or workers. On the ‘good’ side are tariffs championed by important constituencies, such as steel and lumber firms.” “In my view, this line is flimsy and will not survive the 2026 and 2028 election cycles,” Hufbauer added. But if Democrats do win both the House and the Senate, expect more action on bills like Schumer’s that challenge some tariffs. “It’s probable that we’ll see Democrats going against sort of the most far-reaching tariffs,” said Obregon. “But I don’t necessarily think that this is quite yet a turning point where Democrats become the anti-tariff party.” Obregon said that could mean eliminating the Section 301 forced-labour tariffs and the Section 338 duties imposed on Canada, while retaining Section 232 tariffs and China-specific Section 301 tariffs. That broadly tracks Hufbauer’s distinction between tariffs that raise consumer prices and those backed by powerful domestic constituencies. “I don’t see Democrats returning to their free trade playbook which lasted from the Civil War until President Carter,” said Hufbauer. Manak explained the electoral complexity involved and why Democrats are unlikely to embrace free trade anytime soon. “They can’t just one day wake up and decide they’re free traders. That’s just not how it happens,” she said, noting how such a shift would depend on the party’s electoral coalition — namely the relative influence of unions, manufacturing interests, and a future Democratic presidential candidate. “If you have a traditional Dem candidate that is really focused on bringing that union coalition on board, then you’re not going to see much change in a lot of these sectoral tariffs in particular,” she said. Even Hale, who’s been surprised by the shift in messaging from the left, remains unsure whether Democrats are truly flipping the script on tariffs or free trade. “I think it’s too early to tell,” he said. Rather than becoming anti-tariff, Manak concluded, Democrats are really “anti-Trump.” “Democrats are not anti-tariff,” she said. “They’re just anti some tariffs.” National Post Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here. Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.