Oregon AG Drops Demand For Records & Motion To Delay Paramount
UPDATED, with comment from AG: Oregonâs attorney general has dropped a civil investigative demand for Paramount to turn over records related to its efforts to secure federal approval for its merger with Warner Bros. Discovery.
Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield also had asked a state circuit court judge to order Paramount to turn over the materials and to delay Paramountâs closing of its proposed acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery by 60 days so the documents could be reviewed. A hearing has been scheduled for Monday in Multnomah County Circuit Court.
A Paramount spokesperson said, âWe are pleased that the Oregon Attorney General has withdrawn its motion to delay this transaction. It was the right decision and avoids an unwarranted effort to delay a lawful, pro-competitive merger.
âAntitrust authorities around the world have carefully reviewed this transaction, clearing it or concluding that it does not violate any competition laws. That regulatory record underscores what the facts, the law and the economics make clear: this transaction will create a stronger challenger to dominant global streaming and technology platforms, expand consumer choice, increase investment in premium content and theatrical distribution, and create more opportunities for creators and workers. We look forward to completing the transaction and delivering those benefits.â
Watch on Deadline
Jenny Hansson, communications director for Rayfield, said in a statement, âParamount made it clear that they werenât going to comply with the investigative demand, and that they think theyâre above the law. Weâre not going to let them waste Oregoniansâ resources on these games. Weâve withdrawn the motion to consider our next steps.â
California Attorney General Rob Bonta and other state attorneys general are said to be considering a legal challenge to the transaction.
Rayfield sought Paramount records of lobbying of federal officials, as well as its role in a statement that the DOJ released in support of the transaction. The attorney general also sought documents ârelated to the formulation and execution of lobbying strategies aimed at obtaining regulatory approval of the proposed merger, which Respond as internally named âProject Warrior.'â
In a court filing, Paramount has objected to the document requests, arguing, among other things, that they impose âburdens and demands which are disproportionateâ to the Oregon investigation and are âof such marginal relevance that the value of any materials sought is outweighed by the burden imposed on Paramount in having to provide such information.â
âLobbying activities and related communications are wholly irrelevant to whether the proposed acquisition âviolates Oregonâs antitrust laws,'â the companyâs legal team wrote.
Itâs called stay in your lane bruh.
âWill Disney be forced to sell back 20th Century Fox if the Paramount/WB merger is allowed to be completed
How it works
Once you click Generate, Ollama reads this article and crafts 5 comprehension questions. Your answers are graded against the article content â general knowledge won't be enough. Score 70+ to count toward your certificate.
Questions are cached â you'll always get the same 5 for this article.