Kevin Costnerâs âThe Postmanâ Will Restore Your Faith in Other People on Americaâs 250th Birthday
By providing your information, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We use vendors that may also process your information to help provide our services. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA Enterprise and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
On Friday nights, IndieWire After Dark honors fringe cinema in the streaming age with midnight movies from any moment in film history.
First, the BAIT: a weird genre pick, and why weâre exploring its specific niche right now. Then, the BITE: a spoiler-filled answer to the all-important question, âIs this old cult film actually worth recommending?â
My grandmother died two weeks ago. While sorting through her house in Alabama, I found a framed certificate thanking my late grandfather for his 17 years of service with the United States Postal Service.
Dale James Foreman died in 2008, nearly two decades before his wife, June, but his âGoodbye tension, hello pensionâ U.S.P.S. retirement mug was still hanging in the kitchen when I arrived.
More than my grandfatherâs time in the military, Iâve always admired his work for the Postal Service. The letter accompanying his retirement award praises an organization âbuilt on the service of people like you,â and thanks him for helping create âa happier life for our customers.â Itâs a simple sentiment, but one that felt deeply meaningful to me ahead of July 4.
Humanity depends on ordinary people showing up for one another. And that may be the nicest introduction ever given to Kevin Costnerâs wildly self-indulgent, three-hour(!) âThe Postman.â But the director and star did indeed hit on something timeless and vital in his 1997 film.
As far as I can tell, neither of my grandparents ever watched âThe Postman.â Their VHS tapes and DVDs offered no evidence of any particular affection for Costner, much less his disastrous passion project. But rewatching Costnerâs oddly hopeful post-apocalyptic drama on my flight back to Los Angeles, I found myself feeling less alone because of it.
Adapted from David Brinâs novel and released after both the Oscar triumph of âDances With Wolvesâ (good!) and the tabloid circus surrounding âWaterworldâ (oh, NO!), this singularly strange American epic imagines a wasteland where a wandering drifter accidentally inspires a revolution by pretending to be a mail carrier for a restored United States government⌠that hasnât actually been restored at all.
The ridiculous premise, and its brutal reception at the time of release, are enough to qualify âThe Postmanâ as a midnight movie â despite it being a major Warner Bros. title from the height of Costnerâs fame. But the magic of âThe Postmanâ as a cult object lies in the way it has since created its own kind of network. Fans recommend the film to one another when hope feels scarce, passing along its core conviction that society survives through connection rather than conquest. People arenât always moved by stories of heroes who achieve glory. Sometimes they need to hear that someone still needs them.
I first watched âThe Postmanâ last fall after several people recommended it to me on Instagram. Like countless viewers, many of those folks had discovered or rediscovered the film during its strange pandemic-era resurgence in 2020, when Costnerâs spectacularly sincere vision of rebuilding the country through public service suddenly felt a little less absurd. Not only did I love it instantly, but finding âThe Postmanâ the way I did changed my programming optimism for the better. (Suffice to say, my After Dark selection for last Fourth of July was Brian Yuznaâs âSociety,â and if you donât know what that means, the definition of âshuntingâ will fill you in⌠too much.)
The world didnât feel stable last summer. Jeff Bezos was getting married in Venice, while I was wondering whether the World Cup could even still happen in the U.S. It seemed impossible to imagine an American future that wasnât defined by isolation, distrust, and the creeping sense that every institution was either actively failing â or rapidly getting there. Watching âThe Postmanâ back then reminded me that different ideals exist and that powerful weirdos like Kevin Costner once championed them with enough conviction to spend $80 million to bring them to the big screen.
This summer feels different. Not better, exactly. Thereâs still plenty of fear in the air, and Americaâs 250th birthday arrives during another profound period of cultural uncertainty. But the World Cup is happening, and itâs genuinely bringing people together. Even the internetâs collective fixation on Taylor Swiftâs wedding has felt more communal than cynical. And many of my colleagues at IndieWire lit up when I mentioned âThe Postmanâ during our weekly pitch meeting. They remembered it not as the punchline of Costnerâs career but as a movie that shaped their childhoods.
The conversations weâre having about the past feel more communal in 2026. Maybe thatâs why the repertory cinema scene is also exploding right now. Letterboxd, revival screenings, retro recommendations, and even columns like this one are all built on the act of passing a meaningful message from one person to another. Talking about old movies isnât an escape from history, but it can make you feel less lonely, at least.
Affectionately flawed and still essential, âThe Postmanâ understands that better than most. American civilization isnât rebuilt through war in Costnerâs film. It comes back through public service, storytelling, and a willingness to believe that somebody out there still wants to hear from you. The filmâs faith in those principles can seem unbearably saccharine at times, but I personally find that kind of sincerity more patriotic with each passing day. âAlison Foreman
For as long as Iâve known his name, Kevin Costner has been my cinematic cilantro: where some people find grit and depth in his specific late 20th-century movie star presence â a little bit John Wayne in his sturdy, American-bred machismo, mixed with the slickness that defined his â80s movie star peers like Mel Gibson and Tom Cruise â to me, most of his performances have been about as compelling as a bar of soap.
Sure, I like âBull Durhamâ as much as any intelligent person with taste, and youâd be a cold-hearted bastard not to tear up a little watching âField of Dreams.â But pretty much all of his other major starring turns have left me cold. âDances With Wolves?â Bland and uninspired. âThe Bodyguard?â Iâm still looking for the amazing chemistry Costner and Whitney Houston allegedly had. âJFK?â Overrated! âRobin Hood: Prince of Thieves?â One of the most agonizing film-viewing experiences of my life. Costner, to me, has always been an actor of limited emotional range, and a movie star whose charisma and appeal doesnât really hit my personal cinematic wavelength.
And yet, despite not really responding to Costner the star, in recent years Iâve grown increasingly fascinated by Costner the auteur. Watching âHorizon: An American Saga â Part 1,â the first installment of his probably-never-actually-getting-finished passion project, during its release in 2024, I was struck by its ambition and scope, which was alternately maddening and awe-inspiring.
From the thorny starting point of an Apache raid on a Western homestead, Costner weaves a complex, multi-perspective tale that wrestles with the romance and realities of American colonialism and mythmaking. The actor, whose political beliefs donât cleanly map onto the modern divisions of the two-party system, has both a reverence for America as a set of ideals and an awareness of the faults within its history that creates interesting textual friction. If his films arenât always the most cleanly made (his most polished and rewarded, âDances With Wolves,â is the one Iâve been personally least engaged by), theyâre undeniably fascinating insights into his particular worldview.
The tension of Costnerâs America lies at the heart of âThe Postman,â a work of extreme ambition thatâs goofy, ungainly, and somehow a little moving despite its myriad flaws. Costner himself has commented that he should have begun the film with the words âOnce Upon a Time,â because itâs a fable as much as it is a traditional narrative, a parable about a nameless nomad who inspires revolution and hope through initially selfish actions.
The film is way too long; it takes a full hour for our hero to actually become a postman. Its direction is stodgy and unimpressive, and its screenplay stilted and mawkish. And âThe Postmanâ hasnât necessarily changed my opinion on Costner as an actor. The titular nomad needed, perhaps, an actor with a little more mischief and roguishness to sell his transformation from conman to folk hero (Harrison Ford, 55 at the time, may have been a good alternative). Costner is simply too one-dimensional a performer to make that transformation work, and his character feels like an inert symbol rather than a flawed human being from the start.
And yet âThe Postman,â in all its neo-Western, post-apocalyptic glory, is a film too strange not to compel me. In its vision of a desolate America ruled by tyranny and militia, the United States becomes, in the eyes of those who live in its pre-industrial ruins, an idealized symbol of better times. When the dream of a reconnected America is sparked by the Postman, threading together lies to get a quick and easy meal, rebellion against the militia controlling the landscape spreads like wildfire. That this dream was founded on a lie becomes beside the point; if the ideal America doesnât truly exist, does it matter when it still inspires people to fight for justice?
Itâs easy to scoff at the idea that the U.S. Postal Service is what provides that spark, but itâs probably the most genius choice Costner makes. What moves the settlers and scavengers who join the new postal service isnât jingoism or the allure of violence, but the promise of connection a piece of mail represents â the idea that they can still be in communion and conversation with people who live hundreds of miles away. Thereâs something sweetly earnest about the glory with which Costner shoots such an easily overlooked civil service job; a scene where the Postman gallops on his horse to fetch a letter from the hands of a young boy has a grandeur that would make any John Ford Western proud.
Itâs old hat nowadays to call âThe Postmanâ the type of film that isnât made anymore; itâs more accurate to say itâs the type of film that now can only be made with extreme difficulty. Big-budget passion projects still exist, but in the form of works like âMegalopolisâ or Costnerâs own âHorizon,â films stalled for years that require directors to fight tooth and nail to bring them to the screen.
That there was ever a time when Warner Bros. would fund something this weird is frankly insane, and one canât help but admire the fact that it exists at all. Getting a studio to fork over millions of dollars for a blockbuster about the power of the U.S. Postal Service: thatâs the American Dream, baby â or at least Kevin Costnerâs version of it. âWilson Chapman
Read more installments of After Dark, IndieWireâs midnight movie club:
By providing your information, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. We use vendors that may also process your information to help provide our services. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA Enterprise and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
How it works
Once you click Generate, Ollama reads this article and crafts 5 comprehension questions. Your answers are graded against the article content â general knowledge won't be enough. Score 70+ to count toward your certificate.
Questions are cached â you'll always get the same 5 for this article.