general467 wordsRead on Arc Codex

Trump asks Supreme Court to hear his defamation case against CNN

President Donald Trump has asked the Supreme Court to weigh in on his defamation case against cable news giant CNN. In a filing submitted on Aug. 14 but docketed on Thursday, Trump told the justices that “CNN falsely and maliciously portrayed” him “as a knowing liar who fabricated objections to the 2020 election, lacked supporting evidence, and deliberately deceived the American people.” The dispute has its roots in CNN’s coverage of the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election. Trump contended that when CNN used the phrase “the Big Lie” to describe his insistence that the election had been stolen, and that he was the actual winner, it did so to link him with Adolf Hitler and Nazi propaganda – which, Trump said, was defamation. A federal judge in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, dismissed Trump’s case. In an eight-page, unsigned opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit upheld that ruling. The court of appeals explained that whether a plaintiff has a defamation claim hinges on whether the defendant made a false statement of fact. But CNN had not “explicitly claimed that Trump’s ‘actions and statements were designed to be, and actually were, variations of those [that] Hitler used to suppress and destroy populations,’” the court wrote. The court rejected Trump’s contention that CNN’s “use of the phrase ‘Big Lie’” “could reasonably be interpreted’” as equating Trump’s actions with Hitler’s. Instead, the court said, the phrase “Big Lie” “is at least … ambiguous” – just as, the court suggested, Trump’s contention that he was merely “exercising a constitutional right to identify his concerns with the integrity of elections” was “susceptible to multiple subjective interpretations.” Trump then came to the Supreme Court, asking the justices to take up his case. He pointed to the court’s 1990 decision in Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., holding that the First Amendment did not shield an article that was “categorized as ‘opinion’ as opposed to ‘fact’” from a defamation claim. The courts of appeals, Trump contended, have divided – an important factor that the Supreme Court considers in deciding whether to grant review – on how to apply Milkovich. Four courts of appeals, he said, use “contextual, multi-factor tests to consider whether a statement of opinion conveys objectively verifiable facts to a reasonable observer.” But the 11th Circuit in this case effectively made “a ‘subjective assessment’” instead, he argued. Having determined that the phrase “Big Lie” was ambiguous, he contended, the lower court “ignored the false factual claims for which CNN used the ‘Big Lie’ as a shorthand, including its use of photographs comparing President Trump to Hitler.” CNN’s response to Trump’s petition for review is due on Sept. 21. Recommended Citation: Amy Howe, Trump asks Supreme Court to hear his defamation case against CNN, SCOTUSblog (Aug. 20, 2026, 8:05 PM), https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/08/trump-asks-supreme-court-to-hear-his-defamation-case-against-cnn/

How it works

Once you click Generate, Ollama reads this article and crafts 5 comprehension questions. Your answers are graded against the article content — general knowledge won't be enough. Score 70+ to count toward your certificate.

Questions are cached — you'll always get the same 5 for this article.