The Trump Administrationâs Supposed âWarâ on Latin Americaâs Drug Cartels Has a New Name: âOperation Total Exterminationâ
While the War Department says it is currently focused on partner-led deterrence operations, it does not not rule out unilateral US strikes across Latin America.
Given the scale of the carnage and economic fallout from the US-Israeli war on Iran, itâs easy to forget all the other military misadventures Washington is currently engaged in. The Pentagon is still knee deep in the Ukraine conflict, even as the Trump administration talks of diverting military aid from Kiev to West Asia. It is also increasingly involved in military operations in its own âback yardâ, as it likes to call Latin America â not just at sea but on land.
On March 6, we relayed that the US military was opening up a new front against so-called ânarco terroristsâ in Ecuador. The Pentagon had just announced the launch of joint US-Ecuadorian operations against âdesignated terrorist organizationsâ in the Andean country. The statement was accompanied by footage of figures boarding military helicopters, the helicopters then taking off and an explosion.
The video was intended to show that the Pentagon, which for months had been directing the bombing of boats it claimed was carrying drugs from South America, is ânow bombing Narco Terrorists on land,â Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth wrote on social media.â In reality, as an exposĂ© by the New York Times reveals, the actual target of the attack appears to have been a dairy farm in the small village of San MartĂn, on Ecuadorâs northern border with Colombia:
Workers on the farm told The Times that Ecuadorean soldiers arrived by helicopter on March 3, doused several shelters and sheds with gasoline and ignited them after interrogating workers and beating four of them with the butts of their guns. Three of the workers, who requested anonymity for fear of retaliation by the government, said the soldiers later choked and subjected them to electrical shocks before letting them go.
Village residents said Ecuadorean helicopters returned to the farm three days later, on March 6, and appeared to drop explosives on the farmâs smoldering remains. It was at that point, they said, that Ecuadorean soldiers recorded the footage that U.S. and Ecuadorean officials said captured the bombing of a traffickersâ compoundâŠ
The Ecuadorean government said in the news release that it had relied on U.S. âintelligence and supportâ to target the farm, which it said was a camp used to train âabout 50 drug traffickers.â
Ecuadorean officials also said it was a âresting placeâ used by the leader of Comandos de la Frontera, a Colombian armed group that moves cocaine along the Ecuador-Colombia border, according to the authorities.
The Ecuadorean military referred questions to President Daniel Noboa, who did not respond to a detailed list of questionsâŠ
The dairy farmâs owner, Miguel, said he bought the 350-acre farm about six years ago for $9,000, growing it to more than 50 cows used for milk and meat.
Miguel, a 32-year-old carpenter and father of two, asked to be identified by only his first name for fear of retaliation by the government. He showed The Times the landâs property title that listed him as its owner, as well as photos of the farm before it was demolished.
As Miguel stood in the rubble, he denied that his farm was used as a training camp, and said he was baffled by the militaryâs decision to bomb the property.
Jaw-dropping: The U.S. and Ecuador said they had cooperated to blow up a cocaine trafficking operation. Our reporters visited and found it was just a dairy farm, whose residents were brutalized by Ecuadorian soldiers acting on Pentagon intelligence. https://t.co/YHJvLXpnQC pic.twitter.com/IAbotYyIls
â Lydia DePillis (@lydiadepillis) March 24, 2026
CEPRâs Jake Jonson adds more detail (for some reason twitter wonât let me embed the tweet):
More on that joint US-Ecuador military bombing, from @USATODAY
There is video of the Ecuadorian military taking away villagers, heads covered with black bags, days ahead of the bombing . The troops fire apparent warning shots at others watching.
Days later, after being tortured, they were dropped on the side of the road hours away from their homes and told theyâd be killed if they said anything. US response: our operations are meticulously planned and âany insinuation otherwise is false.â This is going to get worse and worseâŠ
This was all too predictable. We ourselves flagged the risks of the USâ militarisation of Ecuador back in May 2024, six months before Trump re-entered the White House, when the then-commander of US Southern Command, General Laura Richardson, was describing the disastrous âPlan Colombiaâ as a model for the entire region:
All of Ecuador is now one giant US military base. And its president is arguably more American than Ecuadorian. At least three years of careful planning and deliberation has finally borne fruit: the US has a new ops centre in Latin America â and whatâs more, in one of the few countries on the planet to have the temerity to vote in a referendum to close down all US military bases on its territory and force all US soldiers to withdraw. That was in 2009. Now, US soldiers and military bases are back with a vengeance.
To give a little flavour of the new situation in Ecuador, here are a few excerpts of the âStatute for the Permanence of US Troops in Ecuadorâ signed by the Noboa government in January (machine translated):
Article 2
United States personnel will be granted privileges, exemptions and immunity equivalent to those granted to the administrative and technical personnel of diplomatic missions under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of April 18, 1961. United States personnel will be able to enter and leave the territory of the Republic of Ecuador with US identification and with orders for collective movement or individual travel⊠United States personnel will be authorised to wear a uniform while fulfilling official duties and to carry weapons while on duty, if authorised by their ordersâŠ
Article 4
Personnel of the United States Department of Defense such as those of the United States will not be responsible for paying any tax or similar charge imposed within the territory of Ecuador, and such personnel may import into Ecuador, export from it and use in its territory any personal property, equipment, supplies, equipment, technology, training or services in connection with activities under this Agreement. Said import, export and use will be exempt from any inspection, license, other restrictions, customs fees, taxes or any other charge applied within the territory of Ecuador.
Given the long, storied history of involvement of US troops and CIA agents in drug trafficking operationsâŠ, one canât help but wonder whether Ecuador is about to see a sharp increase in cocaine exports to Europe and other parts of the world, just as happened with heroin in Afghanistan after the US-NATO invasion and occupation of that country. Ecuador is already believed to be the largest departure point for cocaine to Western and Central Europe.
Now, just under two years later, Ecuador is the largest departure point for cocaine to the entire world. As Infobae reported in December, Ecuador has become the global âsuperhighwayâ for cocaine, with 70% of global traffic passing through its territory.
Most of that traffic passes through the countryâs coastal ports, where President Noboaâs familyâs businesses, Noboa Trading Co., has a particularly large presence. The company has been accused of participating in a massive conspiracy with the Albanian mafia to transport drugs to Europe in banana crates.
Even the State Dept-sponsored OCCRP is calling out Daniel Noboa's connections to the Balkan mafia's drug trafficking network pic.twitter.com/xcNCDmKhKp
â Max Blumenthal (@MaxBlumenthal) December 12, 2025
Meanwhile, Noboaâs US-assisted security crackdown is intensifying. Washington recently established its first permanent FBI branch in Ecuador, where it joins agents from the US Drug Enforcement Administration and the Department of Homeland Security.
As the US presence in the country has grown, so too has the Noboa governmentâs political repression. Earlier this month, Ecuadorâs largest political movement, the left-leaning Citizen Revolution party, was banned, to a chorus of almost total silence from the Western media.
These developments bear disturbing echoes of the USâ dirty wars in Latin America during the Cold War as well as the human rights abuses committed under Plan Colombia (2000-15), including more than 3,000 extrajudicial executions by the US-funded security forces.
Plan Colombia itself had little to no impact on cocaine trafficking. In fact, global cocaine production reached the highest level ever reported in 2016, with most of the production coming from Colombia, according to the United Nationsâ World Drugs Report 2018 (quelle coincidence!).
In 2020, the US House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee admitted that Plan Colombia had been a resounding failure from a counter-narcotics perspective. It did, however, provide short-term benefits from a counter-insurgency perspective, which was almost certainly one of the initiativeâs main goals.
âOperation Total Exterminationâ
Teaming up with narco-controlled governments is a common feature of US counter-narcotics policy. Throughout the post WW2 period, Washington has partnered with governments in the region that were either directly engaged in trafficking or closely allied with traffickers, from Cubaâs Fulgencio Batista to Chileâs Augusto Pinochet, to Panamaâs Manuel Noriega, to Colombiaâs Alvaro Uribe and Hondurasâ Juan Orlando Hernandez, whom Trump just pardoned.
As reader Tom Dority put it a few weeks back, âthis is not a âfight againstâ (narco-terrorists) but is a fight for control of the ownership of the drug tradesâ â a fight that US government agencies, particularly the CIA, have been waging for decades. It is also a pretext for reimposing US dominion over Latin America and its vast deposits of strategic minerals, at a time when the US is trying to ween itself off Chinese-controlled supply chains.
The recent military attacks in Ecuador are a foretaste of what could be in store for the broader region as the US expands its so-called âwarâ on the drug cartels. In an excellent piece for The Intercept, Nick Turse notes that the USâ intensifying military efforts in the Western hemisphere has a new name, and itâs not exactly subtle: âOperation Total Exterminationâ:
Attacks on Latin American drug cartels are âjust the beginningâ, Joseph Humire, the acting assistant secretary of war for homeland defense and Americas security affairs, told members of the House Armed Services Committee last week.
Humire indicated that many more strikes in Latin America are on the horizon. The comments came a day after President Donald Trump again teased American annexation of Cuba. âI do believe Iâll be the honor of â having the honor of taking Cuba,â Trump said last week. âWhether I free it, take it, I think I can do anything I want with it.â
Humire announced that the Department of War supported âbilateral kinetic actions against cartel targets along the Colombia-Ecuador borderâ â Pentagon-speak for March 3 strikes on unnamed âDesignated Terrorist Organizationsâ previously reported by The Intercept. âThe joint effort, named âOperation Total Extermination,â is the start of a military offensive by Ecuador against transnational criminal organizations with the support of the U.S.,â he said.
The U.S.âEcuadorian campaign has already strayed into Colombia after a farm was bombed or hit by âricochet effectâ on March 3, leaving an unexploded 500-pound bomb lying in Colombiaâs border region. In response to a request for comment, U.S. Southern Command referred The Intercept to a statement on X by the Ecuadorian Ministry of Defense confirming the bomb landed in Colombia.
On May 17, Colombiaâs President Gustavo Petro said that Ecuadorâs bombings on the Ecuador-Colombian border had left â27 charred bodiesâ in Colombia. The alleged cause of death was a bomb recovered near homes that had been âdropped from a plane,â and did not match weapons used by armed groups or Colombiaâs military, which he said did not authorize any strike.
Petro apparently asked President Trump to speak to Noboa âbecause we donât want to go to war.â Daniel Noboa rejected the accusation, claiming military operations â supported by âinternational cooperationâ â are being carried out within Ecuadorâs territory against organized crime and illegal mining groups, some of them linked to Colombia.
As Drop Site News notes, citing separate reporting by Revista RAYA, there have been similar unexplained bombings in Nariño in recent weeks, leaving dozens dead with no group claiming responsibility. The dispute take place amid a deepening trade war that began in late January 2026, when Ecuador imposed tariffs of up to 50% on Colombian goods. Colombia responded soon after with 30% tariffs and halted electricity exports.
New Regime Change Target
Noboa is clearly happy for the US to use Ecuador as a lancehead against Colombiaâs left-wing government and other thorns in the USâ side. Washington is also resorting to lawfare campaigns against Colombian President Gustavo Petro. Just a few days ago, the US Justice Department leaked to the Times that Petro is under criminal investigation for allegedly receiving electoral financing from drug traffickers for his triumphant run in the 2022 presidential election.
The timing is certainly curious â just two months before Colombians head to the polls to vote in new presidential elections. Petro himself cannot serve a second term but his chosen successor, IvĂĄn Cepeda, is currently leading in the polls. In another suspiciously timed leak, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency has designated Petro as a âpriority targetâ for âalleged links to drug traffickers,â according to documents consulted by the Associated Press.
It is all conspicuously reminiscent of the DEAâs attempts to sully the name of Mexicoâs then-outgoing left-leaning president, AndrĂ©s Manuel LĂłpez Obrador, just before the countryâs 2024 general elections. The agencyâs intervention did not work out as planned: LĂłpez Obradorâs handpicked successor, Claudia Sheinbaum, won by a landslide. In recent months, the Trump administration has also meddled in elections in Argentina, Honduras and Chile.
Alertđš: The US government is starting the process of lawfare against Colombian president, @petrogustavo, trying to do to him what they have done to Maduro. pic.twitter.com/pqBSZFTwco
â Alan MacLeod (@AlanRMacLeod) March 20, 2026
So, to recap, the US is using both lawfare and warfare to weaken Colombiaâs first ever left wing government. According to Turse, âthe recent leaks about the potential US indictment of⊠Petro on drug charges â the official reason for Maduroâs kidnapping, and the means reportedly used to keep his successor, Rodriguez, in line â suggest the U.S. may employ that tactic as leverage or an eventual pretext for military action. (Petro has denied ties to drug traffickers.)â:
âIt sounds as if Petro is potentially on the chopping block,â a former defense official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity due to his current employment, told The Intercept. The source said leaks about the potential indictment of Petro, coupled with the U.S.âEcuadorian attack, which has stirred up tensions along the South American nationsâ border, increasingly look like a coordinated campaign to foment âdiscordâ if not conflict. Asked in January about attacking Colombia, Trump responded: âIt sounds good to me.â
Meanwhile, the US ignores Noboaâs own well-documented drugs ties. pic.twitter.com/Yxwd3XejaJ
â MintPress News (@MintPressNews) March 26, 2026
Since coming to power in June 2022, Petro has shifted Colombian politics decidedly leftward, or at least as leftward as he could in a country as traditionally conservative as Colombia. He has also denounced the absurdity of the US-led War on Drugs from the podium of the UN General Assembly in New York the UN General Assembly, imposed sanctions on Israel over its genocidal actions in Gaza, and likened US ICE agents to Nazi stormtroopers.
Of course, none of this has anything to do with combatting the drugs trade. If anything, it is about the US deep state wanting to exert even greater control over narcotic supply chains, which probably explains Trumpâs recent pardoning of convicted drug trafficker Juan Orlando HernĂĄndez.
In a 1982 interview, Colombian Nobel Laureate Gabriel Garcia MĂĄrquez explained why the US war on drugs is a total farce:
If the US can provide daily supplies for 30 million drug addicts without any incident or problem, as if it were like delivering milk, bread or the newspaper, it means there are much powerful mafias than those in Colombia and a much greater corruption of the authorities than in Colombia.
North American journalists know everything they know about drug trafficking in Colombia, which is a lot, because Colombian journalists have investigated it, uncovered it, and many have sacrificed their lives breaking those stories. In contrast, we know nothing about what drug trafficking is like in the United States because journalists pretend it doesnât exist.
Drugs as a problem got out of humanityâs hands. The only thing that can resolve this is the legalisation and depenalisation of drugs. But we have to be careful with over-simplifications: this does not mean we will do it in Colombia but not in Peru⊠It would only be possible through a global agreement, but that is very difficult to achieve given the interests involved in the immense drugs business are so great.
The Americas Counter Cartel Coalition
Itâs not hard to guess which countries in the region will be taking part in âOperation Total Exterminationâ, which will essentially mean having the US military conduct military operations on their soil. They include all those whose heads of state and government recently attended Trumpâs Shield of the Americas summit in Miami, as well as the five other countries that signed on to Trumpâs so-called Americas Counter Cartel Coalition after the event (in italics):
- Argentina
- Bolivia
- Bahamas
- Chile
- Costa Rica
- Dominican Republic
- Ecuador
- Guatemala
- Guyana
- Honduras
- Panama
- Paraguay
- Peru
- El Salvador
- Trinidad and Tobago
- Uruguay
- Venezuela
In his testimony to Congress this week Humire said, ominously, that the War Department âwas currently focused on partner-led deterrence operations,â but he would not rule out unilateral US strikes across Latin America, reports Turse:
He said that, in addition to Ecuador, the U.S. had forged agreements with 17 partner-nations in the Western Hemisphere, as part of the so-called Americas Counter Cartel Coalition. This international body, formally announced by Trump at his Shield of the Americas summit earlier this month, will focus on âbi-lateral and multi-lateral operations against cartels and terrorist organizations.â
Humire was asked if any of the⊠[17] nations were concerned about issues of sovereignty regarding the U.S. potentially conducting attacks in their countries. âMembers of the coalition specifically signed a joint security declaration mentioning that they want this support and most of them all are looking for this,â he replied. But the barebones statement they signed is astonishingly vague and offers little of substance on the subject.
They wanted to name it âOperation Condorâ but that name was taken so they went with âOperation Total Exterminationâ instead. Sounds like Hegsethâs idea. You can bet that there are a lot of people in South America are paying attention to what is happening in the Gulf right now. Not just ordinary people but governments, soldiers, cartels and gangs. Just wait till FPV drones make their appearance as well as other sorts of drones. Ironic in that a coupla years ago the US tried to off Maduro using two explosive drones when he was attending a parade. And there is a lot of jungle for those drone users to hide out in-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_Caracas_drone_attack
>Even the State Dept-sponsored OCCRP is calling out Daniel Noboaâs connections to the Balkan mafiaâs drug trafficking network
I suppose there are quite a few people in Washington who are dissatisfied with the partnership with the narco president.
Iâm calling it the Zeus Crisis mainly because itâs Suez backwards, and almost fits into the Fourth Turning, but its only 70 years ago that the English and French had to acquiesce to a higher power and forfeit future forays afield.
Zeus was the main Greek God, and we went to war over the main God in the Golden Billion, a neo-Fourth Crusade.
Seems to be a given that weâll lose hegemon status as the world reels from our actions, can you imagine the distress foreigners would feel seeing Trumpâs nom doubloon that resembles a 7.6 earthquake on the Richter scale, on our Federal Reserve Notes?
Whoops, wrong spot.
Operation Total Extermination: A reprise of The Ugly American?
This administration is solely communicating with its warped, bigoted misogynistic base. The other 75% of us are relegated to the bleachers.
How it works
Once you click Generate, Ollama reads this article and crafts 5 comprehension questions. Your answers are graded against the article content â general knowledge won't be enough. Score 70+ to count toward your certificate.
Questions are cached â you'll always get the same 5 for this article.