How to spot pseudoscience
Pseudoscientific ideas – and the hacks and hucksters who often benefit from them – are certainly nothing new. But in the age of AI slop and unregulated social media platforms, ideas dressed up in the language of science but lacking its methods and rigour have perhaps never been so ubiquitous. Defining what makes an enquiry scientific, and therefore demarcating it from pseudoscience, has actually proved quite difficult, even for scientists and philosophers of science. However, in this TED-Ed animation, Siska De Baerdemaeker, a researcher and philosopher of cosmology at Stockholm University, argues that there is a fairly simple, three-pronged approach that pretty much anyone can adopt to test if a claim is truly scientific, or merely trying to sound the part.
Three handy tools for separating pseudoscience from the real deal
Video by TED-Ed
Director: Eoin Duffy
Writer: Siska De Baerdemaeker
Producers: Anna Bechtol, Abdallah Ewis
videoPhilosophy of science
‘Falsification’ ruled 20th-century science. Does it need revision in the 21st?
2 minutes
videoPhilosophy of science
What toddlers can teach us about how the human brain does science
10 minutes
videoEthics
BBC producer John Lloyd argues against the cult of knowledge and information
2 minutes
videoGender
When aggression is viewed as brilliance, it hurts women in science, and science itself
5 minutes
videoAstronomy
Finding alien life demands real imagination – not recycled sci-fi tropes
5 minutes
videoTechnology and the self
Algorithms are opinions, not truth machines, and demand the application of ethics
3 minutes
videoSpace exploration
How do you message an alien? Carl Sagan offers some simple suggestions
8 minutes
videoKnowledge
Why David Deutsch believes good explanations are the antidote to bad philosophy
10 minutes
videoAstronomy
The history of astronomy is a history of conjuring intelligent life where it isn’t
34 minutes
How it works
Once you click Generate, Ollama reads this article and crafts 5 comprehension questions. Your answers are graded against the article content — general knowledge won't be enough. Score 70+ to count toward your certificate.
Questions are cached — you'll always get the same 5 for this article.